Everyone wants their recruiting performance to be better, faster, and/or cheaper than before. Those goals are possible to achieve, but they aren't very good goals. What does "better," "faster" or "cheaper" actually mean? How will you know that your recruiting performance is faster or better than last month or last year?
To define your goals more specifically, your organization needs to pick two or three issues that are the most important or urgent. Take the time to talk to your team, managers and departments heads to determine those top two or three issues. Even if you're able to come up with a list of issues on your own, speaking with your team will help to crystallize the company's priorities. Once the top issues are chosen, then your organization's goals can be defined around those issues and around your organization's biggest recruiting needs.
Defining your metrics is much more than deciding what you're going to measure. Defining your metrics also means setting a baseline of where your organization is currently and where you were previously. Once those two things are in place, your organization can decide on where it wants those metrics to be within the next six months, 12 months, or within any other specified time period.
There are four basic types of metrics: averages, totals, medians and targets. Your company can use these basic metrics to come up with metrics specific to your company's needs and goals, such as a target for the number of hires coming from referrals, or the average time it takes from interviewing a candidate to making an offer. There are also the common recruiting metrics, such as recruiting cost, signal to noise ratio and cycle time.
To define your metrics and to connect them to your core issues and goals, ask yourself and your organization the following questions:
Keep in mind that your metrics aren't set in stone. If, after a few weeks or months, you find that the metrics you chose or created don't tell you what you need to know about your specific issues (and how to improve them), then feel free to change them and choose or create a better metric.
By infrastructure, we mean the system or technology you will use to keep track of the data for each of your metrics. The default system may be an applicant tracking system, but depending on your organization's metrics and needs, an ATS might not be the best option. After all, an ATS isn't going to fix bad data. An ATS also isn't going to bring consistency and discipline, two qualities that are needed to ensure that your data is cumulative, accurate, and able to provide a historical snapshot of what's happening within your company's recruiting performance.
Your organization's reporting infrastructure should be able to provide data in three ways:
Once your organization has defined its goals, metrics and infrastructure, the next steps are to define the solution and to execute the plan. We're going to go over the last two steps in the second and final part of this series.